<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 11-15 Old Fulton Street Under Contract</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dumbonyc.com/2007/10/05/old-fulton-bldg-under-contract/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dumbonyc.com/2007/10/05/old-fulton-bldg-under-contract/</link>
	<description>Notes from the DUMBO, Brooklyn NY neighborhood</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 21:03:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christy Stewart</title>
		<link>http://dumbonyc.com/2007/10/05/old-fulton-bldg-under-contract/comment-page-1/#comment-44209</link>
		<dc:creator>Christy Stewart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 04:55:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dumbonyc.com/2007/10/05/old-fulton-bldg-under-contract/#comment-44209</guid>
		<description>Looks like they got landmarks approval to build one more story and re-zoned it through the city.  &lt;br&gt;I can&#039;t believe landmarks allowed this.  It is in the Fulton Ferry Historic District.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The NYC Board of Standards and Appeals, as lead agency, has determined that the 11-15 Old Fulton Street, Brooklyn (BSA Cal. No. 136-06-BZ-CEQR No. 06BSA106K) will not have a significant adverse environmental impact. Public comment period ends January 24, 2007. The action involves a Zoning variance under § 72-21 to allow the residential conversion and one-story enlargement of three (3) existing four (4) story buildings. The proposed development violates use (§ 42-00), FAR (§ 43-12), and rear yard (§ 43-26 &amp; § 43-27) regulations. The project would include ground floor retail space and twelve (12) dwelling units on the upper floors. The project is located at 11-15 Old Fulton Street, Brooklyn (Block 35, Lots 7, 8, &amp; 9).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like they got landmarks approval to build one more story and re-zoned it through the city.  <br />I can&#39;t believe landmarks allowed this.  It is in the Fulton Ferry Historic District.</p>
<p>The NYC Board of Standards and Appeals, as lead agency, has determined that the 11-15 Old Fulton Street, Brooklyn (BSA Cal. No. 136-06-BZ-CEQR No. 06BSA106K) will not have a significant adverse environmental impact. Public comment period ends January 24, 2007. The action involves a Zoning variance under § 72-21 to allow the residential conversion and one-story enlargement of three (3) existing four (4) story buildings. The proposed development violates use (§ 42-00), FAR (§ 43-12), and rear yard (§ 43-26 &amp; § 43-27) regulations. The project would include ground floor retail space and twelve (12) dwelling units on the upper floors. The project is located at 11-15 Old Fulton Street, Brooklyn (Block 35, Lots 7, 8, &amp; 9).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fulton ferry res</title>
		<link>http://dumbonyc.com/2007/10/05/old-fulton-bldg-under-contract/comment-page-1/#comment-43051</link>
		<dc:creator>fulton ferry res</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 20:45:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dumbonyc.com/2007/10/05/old-fulton-bldg-under-contract/#comment-43051</guid>
		<description>The word from LPC was that financing had fallen through. However, that didn&#039;t stop about 8-10 young men (friends of the new owner, I presume)from bringing a portable grill up to the roof a few weeks ago on a Sunday and having themselves a party.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The word from LPC was that financing had fallen through. However, that didn&#8217;t stop about 8-10 young men (friends of the new owner, I presume)from bringing a portable grill up to the roof a few weeks ago on a Sunday and having themselves a party.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: av</title>
		<link>http://dumbonyc.com/2007/10/05/old-fulton-bldg-under-contract/comment-page-1/#comment-42984</link>
		<dc:creator>av</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 00:02:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dumbonyc.com/2007/10/05/old-fulton-bldg-under-contract/#comment-42984</guid>
		<description>Now that it&#039;s May, any update on these buildings guys? I walked by a couple of weeks and thought to myself &#039;what a shame there&#039;s nothing going on here&#039;

City records showed the owners bought the 3 buildings at the end of &#039;07 (top of the market to ya) for $6.6mm ... OUCH!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now that it&#8217;s May, any update on these buildings guys? I walked by a couple of weeks and thought to myself &#8216;what a shame there&#8217;s nothing going on here&#8217;</p>
<p>City records showed the owners bought the 3 buildings at the end of &#8217;07 (top of the market to ya) for $6.6mm &#8230; OUCH!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: twink</title>
		<link>http://dumbonyc.com/2007/10/05/old-fulton-bldg-under-contract/comment-page-1/#comment-41237</link>
		<dc:creator>twink</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 03:14:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dumbonyc.com/2007/10/05/old-fulton-bldg-under-contract/#comment-41237</guid>
		<description>Fulton Ferry Res - Thank you for the info.  I will be sure to contact them!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fulton Ferry Res &#8211; Thank you for the info.  I will be sure to contact them!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fulton ferry res</title>
		<link>http://dumbonyc.com/2007/10/05/old-fulton-bldg-under-contract/comment-page-1/#comment-41232</link>
		<dc:creator>fulton ferry res</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 22:42:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dumbonyc.com/2007/10/05/old-fulton-bldg-under-contract/#comment-41232</guid>
		<description>FFLA is developing a website. In the meantime, you can write to: fultonferry (at) gmail (dot) com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FFLA is developing a website. In the meantime, you can write to: fultonferry (at) gmail (dot) com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: twink</title>
		<link>http://dumbonyc.com/2007/10/05/old-fulton-bldg-under-contract/comment-page-1/#comment-41147</link>
		<dc:creator>twink</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 03:02:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dumbonyc.com/2007/10/05/old-fulton-bldg-under-contract/#comment-41147</guid>
		<description>We live in Fulton Ferry Landing and would like to know more about the Fulton Ferry Landing Association.  Do they have a website?  How can I contact them?  I tried googling and indeed they are referenced lots of places, but no contact info.  If anyone has any information about the organization, we would appreciate it!  Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We live in Fulton Ferry Landing and would like to know more about the Fulton Ferry Landing Association.  Do they have a website?  How can I contact them?  I tried googling and indeed they are referenced lots of places, but no contact info.  If anyone has any information about the organization, we would appreciate it!  Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fulton ferry res</title>
		<link>http://dumbonyc.com/2007/10/05/old-fulton-bldg-under-contract/comment-page-1/#comment-41121</link>
		<dc:creator>fulton ferry res</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Dec 2008 02:16:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dumbonyc.com/2007/10/05/old-fulton-bldg-under-contract/#comment-41121</guid>
		<description>FYI - The Fulton Ferry Landing Association fought the original developer&#039;s (Michael Zazza) application to Landmarks, which was to add 3 stories to the rooftop. It ended up approved for one additional floor, set back from the front. Zazza flipped it after it got approved at BSA. An LPC rep has reported that interior work is about to start, but no evidence yet. FWIW, an FDNY captain told me the buildings were in good shape &quot;for their age.&quot; And the joists were indeed built for loads much larger than residential usage.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FYI &#8211; The Fulton Ferry Landing Association fought the original developer&#8217;s (Michael Zazza) application to Landmarks, which was to add 3 stories to the rooftop. It ended up approved for one additional floor, set back from the front. Zazza flipped it after it got approved at BSA. An LPC rep has reported that interior work is about to start, but no evidence yet. FWIW, an FDNY captain told me the buildings were in good shape &#8220;for their age.&#8221; And the joists were indeed built for loads much larger than residential usage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bedrock</title>
		<link>http://dumbonyc.com/2007/10/05/old-fulton-bldg-under-contract/comment-page-1/#comment-41116</link>
		<dc:creator>Bedrock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 20:17:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dumbonyc.com/2007/10/05/old-fulton-bldg-under-contract/#comment-41116</guid>
		<description>We heard the building was purchased by same developers that developed a property at 85 North 3rd street in Williamburg - called the Mill Building. They are former low end housing developers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We heard the building was purchased by same developers that developed a property at 85 North 3rd street in Williamburg &#8211; called the Mill Building. They are former low end housing developers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jstein</title>
		<link>http://dumbonyc.com/2007/10/05/old-fulton-bldg-under-contract/comment-page-1/#comment-40783</link>
		<dc:creator>Jstein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 03:25:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dumbonyc.com/2007/10/05/old-fulton-bldg-under-contract/#comment-40783</guid>
		<description>ummm.  that charles is a little in the dark and naive i think.  these buildings do not have solid foundations and lie over a persistent and very old underground stream.  the water has shifted and eaten away the ground beneath these buildings.  that is why they lilt so.  i suspect this is also why nothing is going on with these buildings in way more than 12 months.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ummm.  that charles is a little in the dark and naive i think.  these buildings do not have solid foundations and lie over a persistent and very old underground stream.  the water has shifted and eaten away the ground beneath these buildings.  that is why they lilt so.  i suspect this is also why nothing is going on with these buildings in way more than 12 months.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tom</title>
		<link>http://dumbonyc.com/2007/10/05/old-fulton-bldg-under-contract/comment-page-1/#comment-40780</link>
		<dc:creator>tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 03:05:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dumbonyc.com/2007/10/05/old-fulton-bldg-under-contract/#comment-40780</guid>
		<description>We looked at these buldings a while back. They are ready to fall down. Major structural issues, water damage, wall sections failing, settling issues. I think these developers are about to open a major can of worms unless they have other intentions. Be careful!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We looked at these buldings a while back. They are ready to fall down. Major structural issues, water damage, wall sections failing, settling issues. I think these developers are about to open a major can of worms unless they have other intentions. Be careful!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tome</title>
		<link>http://dumbonyc.com/2007/10/05/old-fulton-bldg-under-contract/comment-page-1/#comment-40777</link>
		<dc:creator>Tome</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 18:16:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dumbonyc.com/2007/10/05/old-fulton-bldg-under-contract/#comment-40777</guid>
		<description>So what happened? Obviously nothing started as of June 2007. Where do things stand?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So what happened? Obviously nothing started as of June 2007. Where do things stand?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dumbostreets</title>
		<link>http://dumbonyc.com/2007/10/05/old-fulton-bldg-under-contract/comment-page-1/#comment-37366</link>
		<dc:creator>dumbostreets</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 23:24:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dumbonyc.com/2007/10/05/old-fulton-bldg-under-contract/#comment-37366</guid>
		<description>Is there a view from these buildings?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there a view from these buildings?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: charles</title>
		<link>http://dumbonyc.com/2007/10/05/old-fulton-bldg-under-contract/comment-page-1/#comment-37365</link>
		<dc:creator>charles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 05:46:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dumbonyc.com/2007/10/05/old-fulton-bldg-under-contract/#comment-37365</guid>
		<description>Jess,

There is the intention to have ground floor retail, a tenant has yet to be decided on.

Regarding the structural integrity of the  property there are 3x12 wood beams that run throughout the property that which are more supportive than the current steal beams used in new construction. There will be additional joists places as needed for addittional support.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jess,</p>
<p>There is the intention to have ground floor retail, a tenant has yet to be decided on.</p>
<p>Regarding the structural integrity of the  property there are 3&#215;12 wood beams that run throughout the property that which are more supportive than the current steal beams used in new construction. There will be additional joists places as needed for addittional support.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jess</title>
		<link>http://dumbonyc.com/2007/10/05/old-fulton-bldg-under-contract/comment-page-1/#comment-37357</link>
		<dc:creator>Jess</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 02:40:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dumbonyc.com/2007/10/05/old-fulton-bldg-under-contract/#comment-37357</guid>
		<description>Charles, any plans for ground floor retail?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Charles, any plans for ground floor retail?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: prof h. hill</title>
		<link>http://dumbonyc.com/2007/10/05/old-fulton-bldg-under-contract/comment-page-1/#comment-37355</link>
		<dc:creator>prof h. hill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2008 17:39:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dumbonyc.com/2007/10/05/old-fulton-bldg-under-contract/#comment-37355</guid>
		<description>Jeez, I don&#039;t know. I keep scrolling back up to the photo of these buildings and I wonder who ever built them originally has to be spinning in their grave. They look like simple mercantile buildings built for simple functions. I get the impression that these buildings were built on the &quot;cheap&quot;. Somewhere between preserving every antebellum brick box and taking it up the rear with a J Condo there has to be a rational middle ground.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeez, I don&#8217;t know. I keep scrolling back up to the photo of these buildings and I wonder who ever built them originally has to be spinning in their grave. They look like simple mercantile buildings built for simple functions. I get the impression that these buildings were built on the &#8220;cheap&#8221;. Somewhere between preserving every antebellum brick box and taking it up the rear with a J Condo there has to be a rational middle ground.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

