Stop Work Order Violation Issued at 205 Water Street
February 14th, 2007
After we posted the story about the demolition of 205 Water Street, David Yassky received overwhelming response to stop the demolition of the building. (Thanks to all who called or wrote in!) According to the NYC Department of Buildings, they have issued a 10 day letter of intent to revoke their application. This is a STOP work order due to the violations reported by the nearby residents and people who called into Yassky’s office. The architect has 10 days to respond before the city can revoke their permit to demolish the building.
Previous 205 Water Street posts:
{Demolition at 205 Water Street, DumboNYC}
{In the Press: Demolishing 205 Water Street, DumboNYC}
5 Responses to “Stop Work Order Violation Issued at 205 Water Street”
Leave a Reply
- Construction Start at 205 Water St
- Toll Brothers to set up Sales Office in Dumbo
- Proposed 205 Water St Building Approved
- 205 Water Street On Schedule for mid-2012
- Stop Work Order Issued at 192 Water Street
- 205 Water Street Condo Begins Advertising
- 205 Water Street Construction Progress
- 205 Water Street Plans Revealed
- More 205 Water St Renderings
- NY Times Cityroom Prompts 215 Plymouth Stop Work Order


February 14th, 2007 at 6:23 pm
What’s the yellow building being developed on top of another building in Vinegar Hill?
February 14th, 2007 at 7:56 pm
Its a mess. Check out the Dept. of Bdlgs website on it. The thing just keeps growing. Its susposed to be a condo…..one day. Guttman is doing the work on it.
February 15th, 2007 at 5:55 pm
Does the building have a name/web site or is it just going by the address at this point?
February 16th, 2007 at 11:03 am
Check out the Dept. of Bdlgs system, the bdlg is listed under 53 Bridge Street. They have taken in allot of violations and already have two stop work orders.
The same guys had built the condos at 50 Bridge Street. And the condo owners over there have been engaged in a lawsuit against the devloper due to bad work, leaks, etc.
February 20th, 2007 at 4:25 pm
Thanks!